← All services
06 // Autonomous

Your tests break.
They fix
themselves.

Most test failures in a mature automation project are routine — selectors drift, labels change, layouts shift. Autonomous Maintenance resolves these automatically, so your engineers never have to stop and babysit the test suite.

Get in touch ↗ See how it works
✗
Step 01
Test fails — failure logged with full context
◎
Step 02
Ticket auto-created with AI diagnosis
◈
Step 03
AI writes fix, commits to version control
↺
Step 04
Test re-runs — retries on failure
✓
Step 05
Verified green — fix committed, loop closes
Real example

From failure to fixed —
fully automated.

Failed test in AQA
01 — Failure detected
Test fails in AQA
Logged with full context — stack trace, page screenshot at moment of failure, duration, and retry count.
Auto-generated Jira ticket with AI analysis
02 — Ticket created
Jira ticket with AI diagnosis
Auto-created with the full stack trace and an AI-generated step-by-step breakdown of exactly where and why the test failed.
Automated fix execution in version control
03 — Fix executed
AI writes and verifies the fix
The pipeline writes the fix, commits it, and re-runs the test automatically. Results posted back without any developer involvement.
Test now passing after autonomous fix
04 — Verified green
Test passes — no developer involved
Same test, same environment. Fixed, committed, and verified by the pipeline. From failure to green with zero human input.
What it handles

The failures that consume
most of your team's time.

~70%
of failures in a mature test suite are routine maintenance

Selector drift, label changes, minor layout shifts — these aren't bugs in your software. They're the natural friction of a product that keeps moving. They're also entirely predictable, entirely repetitive, and entirely automatable.



Autonomous Maintenance was built on Dynamics 365 — one of the most complex ERP environments in enterprise software. If the pipeline handles that, it handles your application.

→
Selector drift
XPath and CSS selectors break when UI structure changes. The most common failure type in any long-running suite.
→
Label & text changes
Button text, field labels, menu items — any copy change in the application can break tests that assert on exact strings.
→
Layout & flow shifts
Element positions change, new fields appear, navigation paths reorganise. Tests built against an older layout need updating.
→
Timeout & timing issues
Wait conditions that no longer match the current page behaviour — adjusted automatically based on observed failure patterns.
◈
Built on real complexity, not a simple proof of concept
Autonomous Maintenance was validated on Dynamics 365 — a highly customised enterprise ERP environment with complex multi-system integrations. Simpler, better-structured applications see even higher fix rates. The capability will continue to expand as the service matures.

See it run on
your test suite.

Share your test report with us. We'll show you how many failures Autonomous Maintenance would have handled automatically — before you commit to anything.

Get in touch ↗ ← All services